I Have No Pity For The Ousted Honduran President
"After arriving in Costa Rica, deposed President Manuel Zelaya said he had been kidnapped by soldiers in a "coup".
Mr. Zelaya, elected for a nonrenewable four-year term in 2006, had wanted a vote to extend his time in office.
His arrest came just before the start of a referendum ruled illegal by the Supreme Court and opposed by Congress.
There had also been resistance within Mr. Zelaya's own party regarding the President's desire to extend his time in office."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8123126.stm
Indeed Manuel Zelaya was constitutionally elected to serve four years as president of Honduras but has been removed by the military and taken into exile. So why am I not sympathetic to his cause? This one is very easy to answer.
Mr. Zeyala was not contented with serving one term as President. Does he believe that he is the answer to the problems in the country and that no one else is qualified enough to resolve the issues? So many leaders in Central America, the Caribbean region and Africa too often do not want to give up power and would do anything even break the constitution that put them there in the first place to become the next Chavez.
Mr. Zeyala wanted a referendum to extend his stay in office or to give himself the opportunity to run for office again - this is totally against the constitution of the land. The Supreme Court was not sympathetic to his cause and ruled that the referendum was illegal. However, the President convinced that his power and wishes were more important than that of the highest court of the land moved ahead with his plans for the referendum even though members of his own party were against this process.
Mr. Zeyala should consider himself very fortunate that the military exiled him and did not arrest him as is done in most banana republics. The long reach of Chavez and Chavez like aspirations must be stopped and was rightly done in my opinion.
Everyone is condemning the actions of the military. What have they done/do you realize what took place? Simply put, they protected the constitution that they swore to protect and serve!
I have no pity for the leftist Zeyala - move on with your life and consider yourself very fortunate sir. As for the Prime Minister of Trinidad and Tobago who spoke out on behalf of the 'rule of law' ... do your job and take care of the citizens of Trinidad and Tobago - you are so lacking and the people are still without water and electricity in many areas.
Move on...
Comments
Indeed Ken well said...
I don't think Zeyala, Chavez and thier brethren care much about the people who they claim to be seeking power to help. They just want to help themselves but are not honest enough to admit it. They are greedy for money and power but then aren't we all really. Adam Smith recognized this human characteristic and proposed that a free enterprise system, were every person was free to compete to serve the community (meaning marketplace of people who wanted and needed things and were willing and able to buy them) would take advantage of mankind's desire to prosper and live well and reward the creative and productive members of society with profit. In the process those business owners would enrich other members of the society through employment as well as fund the requirements of legitmate government through paying taxes. Of course there are always going to be abuses by those (like Zeyala, Chavez, Castro, Soros, etc.) who don't have a problem with taking advantage of those less talented or able to produce. Of course Adam Smith was a devout man who also understood that no system, collectivist of competetive, could provide a good life for all without the leaders of that system adhereing to a legal system that had for it's basis the principles which our creator has given us to live by.